# Brown v. Harold

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 20, 2006

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1021098

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 20, 2006
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1021098

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7163

MICHAEL JOHN BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CYNTHIA HAROLD, Counselor; DR. TERRY S.
JENKENS, Executive Director, CSB; MAYOR
OBENDORF, Mayor, Virginia Beach,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:06-cv-00287-RBS)

Submitted: November 6, 2006 Decided: November 20, 2006

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael John Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Michael John Brown appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Brown v. Harold, No. 2:06-cv-00287-RBS (E.D.

Va. June 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1021098. Public record. Not legal advice.