# Brown v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 19, 2006 · 203 F. App'x 449

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1020742

## Case

- **Full name:** Calvin Earl BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, (P & D Lodging, Inc.), Defendant-Appellee; Calvin Earl Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Pitt Co. Schools, Defendant-Appellee; Calvin Earl Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sam’s Club, Inc., Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 19, 2006
- **Citations:** 203 F. App'x 449
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, King, Duncan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1020742

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1805

CALVIN EARL BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
(P & D Lodging, Inc.),

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 06-1815

CALVIN EARL BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Pitt
Co. Schools,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 06-1816

CALVIN EARL BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Sam’s
Club, Inc.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:05-cv-00074-H; 4:05-cv-00075-H;
4:05-cv-00148-H)

Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 19, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:

Calvin E. Brown appeals from three separate actions

alleging employment discrimination, which have been consolidated on

appeal. In each case, the district court adopted the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation to dismiss as frivolous the

action, under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915(A) (West Supp. 2006),

and noted that despite clear notice, Brown failed to file

objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. Thus Brown

has waived his right to appeal these orders. Wells v. Shriners

Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir. 1997); United States v.

Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). We find no reversible

error in the district court’s orders in each case denying Brown’s

motion to reconsider and his motion to appoint counsel.

Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See

Brown v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n, No. 4:05-cv-74-H

(E.D.N.C. June 20, 2006 & July 7, 2006); Brown v. Equal Employment

Opportunity Comm’n, No. 4:05-cv-75-H (E.D.N.C. June 20, 2006 &

July 7, 2006); Brown v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n, No.

4:05-cv-148-H (E.D.N.C. June 20, 2006 & July 7, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1020742. Public record. Not legal advice.