# Babaoye v. South Louisiana Community College

> District Court, W.D. Louisiana · July 22, 2021

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10194338

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, W.D. Louisiana
- **Decided:** July 22, 2021
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10194338

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAFAYETTE DIVISION

MARCUS S. BABAOYE CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-00960

VERSUS JUDGE JUNEAU

SOUTH LOUISIANA COMMUNITY MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHITEHURST
COLLEGE, ET AL

MEMORANDUM RULING

Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Board of
Supervisors of Louisiana Community & Technical College System and Natalie
Harder, Rec. Doc. 82. Noting that there was no timely opposition to the motion,1 the
Court has reviewed the record in the case, including the pleadings, the Plaintiff and
Defendant Harder’s depositions, the instant motion, the submitted evidence, and the
relevant law to reassure itself of the propriety of the motion before granting summary
judgment. Having done so, the Court finds that the instant motion is valid in its
conclusion that the Plaintiff has not shown the existence of a genuine issue of
material fact. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that

1 “A motion for summary judgment cannot be granted simply because there is no opposition, even if the failure to
oppose violated a local rule. The movant has the burden of establishing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact,
and unless he has done so, the court may not grant the motion, regardless of whether any response was filed.” Hetzel
v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. 50 F.3d 360, 362 (5th Cir. 1995). However, in light of the Plaintiff’s failure to file a timely
opposition and statement of contested material facts, the Court deems the Defendants’ statement of uncontested
material facts, Rec. Doc. 82-2, admitted for purposes of the motion. Local Rule 56.2W.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Rec. Doc 82, is GRANTED;
That the hearing in this matter set for August 19, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. is
CANCELLED, along with all other proceedings and deadlines contained in the
Court’s previous Scheduling Order, Rec. Doc. 78, that have not yet passed; and,
That the Plaintiff's claims, and this matter, are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE, at Plaintiff's cost.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, on this 22nd day of
July, 2021.

MICHAEL J. Ae
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10194338. Public record. Not legal advice.