# Brown v. Triton Security

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 27, 2006

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1018905

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 27, 2006
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1018905

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2318

DWIGHT C. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TRITON SECURITY; MIKE FINGERHUT; JOY APPLEBY,
Vice President,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-1544-1)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Abbey Gail Hairston, Jessica
Regan Hughes, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Dwight C. Brown appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v.

Triton Security, No. CA-04-1544-1 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19, 2005 &

entered Oct. 21, 2005). We grant Appellees’ motion to strike

Brown’s reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1018905. Public record. Not legal advice.