# Brown v. Triton Security

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 28, 2005

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1018114

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 28, 2005
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1018114

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1759

DWIGHT C. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TRITON SECURITY; MIKE FINGERHUT, PRESIDENT;
JOY APPLEBY, VICE PRESIDENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-1544-1)

Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Abbey Gail Hairston, Jessica
Regan Hughes, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Dwight C. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motions for reconsideration and to “Subpoena Case

and Employment Records.” This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.

541 (1949). The order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1018114. Public record. Not legal advice.