# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 30, 2005

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1017794

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 30, 2005
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1017794

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7434

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WAYNELY BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CR-99-75)

Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 30, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Waynely Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Waynely Brown appeals a district court order denying his

motion to compel the Government to file a Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure Rule 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the

district court. See United States v. Waynely, No. CR-99-75

(W.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1017794. Public record. Not legal advice.