# German v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 30, 2005 · 144 F. App'x 334

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1017196

## Case

- **Full name:** Nakia Laron GERMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Angelia R. BROWN, Captain, Administrative Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Sued in Individual Capacity, Defendant—Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 30, 2005
- **Citations:** 144 F. App'x 334
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Duncan, King, Motz, Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1017196

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6694

NAKIA LARON GERMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANGELIA R. BROWN, Captain, Administrative
Disciplinary Hearing Officer, sued in
individual capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(CA-04-22900-8)

Submitted: September 19, 2005 Decided: September 30, 2005

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nakia Laron German, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Nakia Laron German appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See German v. Brown,

No. CA-04-22900-8 (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1017196. Public record. Not legal advice.