# Jones v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 26, 2005 · 139 F. App'x 576

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1016726

## Case

- **Full name:** Willis Andrea JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.C. BROWN, Durham County Police Officer, Defendant-Appellee, and Durham County Police Department, Defendant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 26, 2005
- **Citations:** 139 F. App'x 576
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Motz, Traxler, Shedd
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1016726

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7129

WILLIS ANDREA JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. C. BROWN, Durham County Police Officer,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CA-01-308-1)

Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 26, 2005

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willis Andrea Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Warren Baker, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, Keith David Burns,
Heather Elizabeth Carpenter, FAISON & GILLESPIE, Durham, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:

Willis Andrea Jones appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Brown,

No. CA-01-308-1 (M.D.N.C. filed June 1 & entered June 3, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1016726. Public record. Not legal advice.