# Wiggins v. Martin County Board of Education

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 18, 2005 · 123 F. App'x 141

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1015681

## Case

- **Full name:** Shirley WIGGINS; Ronnie Howell, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; Karen Dameron; Reatha Garner, Deceased; Angela Matthews; Willie C. Peele; Lisa Gauls; Janet Kallen; Tom Daily; Bonita Andrews; Brenda White; Perry James; Angela Freeman, Defendants—Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 18, 2005
- **Citations:** 123 F. App'x 141
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Williams, Michael, Hamilton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1015681

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2118

SHIRLEY WIGGINS; RONNIE HOWELL,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; KAREN
DAMERON; REATHA GARNER, deceased; ANGELA
MATTHEWS; WILLIE C. PEELE; LISA GAULS; JANET
KALLEN; TOM DAILY; BONITA ANDREWS; BRENDA
WHITE; PERRY JAMES; ANGELA FREEMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (CA-04-17-4-FL(4))

Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 18, 2005

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shirley Wiggins, Ronnie Howell, Appellants Pro Se. Donna Rhea
Rascoe, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing

this action filed under the Family Education Rights and Privacy

Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Wiggins v. Martin County Bd. of Ed., No.

CA-04-17-4-FL(4) (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 18, 2004 & entered Aug. 19,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1015681. Public record. Not legal advice.