# Mallory v. Chairman, Virginia Parole Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 8, 2005 · 122 F. App'x 679

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1015663

## Case

- **Full name:** Calvin R. MALLORY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHAIRMAN, VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendant—Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 8, 2005
- **Citations:** 122 F. App'x 679
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, Williams, King
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1015663

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7739

CALVIN R. MALLORY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHAIRMAN, VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-02-337)

Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 8, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin R. Mallory, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Calvin R. Mallory appeals the magistrate judge’s order

declining to consider his letter submitted to the court because it

did not comply with requirements set forth in the district court’s

order entered October 4, 2002. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Mallory’s motion to

proceed in formal pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Mallory v. Chairman Virginia Parole Bd.,

No. CA-02-337 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1015663. Public record. Not legal advice.