# Gakuba v. Otey

> District Court, S.D. Illinois · February 27, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10151681

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, S.D. Illinois
- **Decided:** February 27, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10151681

## Opinion text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
PETER GAKUBA, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 17-cv-1075-SMY
)
KRISTIE OTEY, et al., )
)
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff Peter Gakuba, an inmate in the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections
(“IDOC”), filed this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his constitutional rights
were violated while he was incarcerated at Robinson Correctional Center (“Robinson”).
Defendant moved for sanctions, asserting that Plaintiff had repeatedly failed to provide responses
to written discovery, failed to comply with court orders, and refused to take his properly noticed
deposition. On August 8, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiff to reimburse Counsel for Defendant
the costs of the court reporter appearance in the amount of $264.50 (Doc. 138). Plaintiff was
warned that failure to comply would result in this action being dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff
failed to comply with the sanction order and this action was dismissed with prejudice (see Doc.
141). Plaintifffiled a Notice of Appeal and movesto proceed on appeal in forma pauperis(“IFP”)
(Doc. 153). For the following reasons, the Motion is DENIED.
A federal court may permit a party to proceed on appeal without full pre-payment of fees
provided the party is indigent and the appeal is taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) & (3);
FED.R.APP.P.24(a)(3)(A). An appeal is taken in “good faith” if it seeks review of any issue that
is not clearly frivolous; in other words, that a reasonable person could suppose it to have at least
some legal merit. Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000).
Here, Plaintiff’s appeal is frivolous. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 permits dismissal
of a case when the court finds “willfulness, bad faith or fault on the part of the defaulting party.”
Brown v. Columbia Sussex Corp., 664 F.3d 182, 190 (7th Cir. 2011). Plaintiff has not set forth an
arguable basis in either law or fact for his appeal and there is nothing indicating that his appeal has
any legal merit. As such, Plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith, and his request to proceed
on appeal in forma pauperis is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 27, 2020
Ao KM Cele
STACI M. YANDLE
United States District Judge

Page 2 of 2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10151681. Public record. Not legal advice.