# Sledge v. Village of Melrose Park, The > District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 25, 2023 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10149049 ## Case - **Court:** District Court, N.D. Illinois - **Decided:** May 25, 2023 - **Opinion:** 100trialcourt - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10149049 ## Opinion text UNITED STATES District courr | LE D NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS □□ □□ EASTERN DIVISION MAY 25 2023 □ THOMAS G. BRUTON Samuel Sledge-Plaintiff, CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT Vv CASE NO 1: 2022 CV 03935 The Village of Melrose Park-Defendant, Motion for Judgment as a matter of law (c » \e Jurisdiction Article 111 § 11 USC Extend to cases and controversy's under USC. 1. Law; motion to invoke the agency’s original jurisdiction on its application of ordinance and state law. That conflicts with federal law under Article 1 § 8 cl 3. 2. The final order must apply a rehearing for contested cases under APA 5 ILCS 100/1- 30, 5 ILCS 100/1 50 and hearing are allowed under 235 ILCS 5 /7-9. the failure to apply the following statutes affected equal protection of law under the USC. 3. The mayors final order conflicts with due process of law the arbitrary and capricious (not done by statute) order doesn't allow equal protection of law. Cases and controversy's 4. The requirement for the due process clause is the provision of adequate notice and some kind of hearing before an individual is deprived of property or interest Bradley v village of Univ. Park 929, F 3d. 875, 882 (7™ cir. 2019). Motion to dismiss under 12 (b) 6 5. A district court must limit itself to the facts stated in the complaint or documents to the complaint as exhibits Kramer v Time Warner Inc, 937 F.2d. 767, 773 (2d Cir. 1991) See plaintiff exhibits 7. 6. A claim has factual plausibility when the plaintiff factual contents that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is libel for his misconduct alleged, Ashcroft v Iqbal 556, U.S. 662, 678, 129 S Ct. 1937, 173 L. E. 2d 868 (2009). 7. The court must accept all factual allegations as true, but give no effect to legal conclusions, Skinner v Switzer 562, U.S. 521, 530, (2011) All facts in the pleadings are true and the court to apply the law to the facts to the motion on the pleadings. The commissioner must accept plaintiff certificate of authority to transact business 8. The fact is that the village doesn't regulate foreign cooperation's and that the court must apply the act of congress that regulates international commerce for foreign cooperation's. In its findings. 9. Judgment on the pleadings on the basics that no answer has been filed to admit or deny the factual pleadings enclosed, that there are no material issues of fact to be resolved, and that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. WHEREFORE, plaintiff respectfully request that this honorable court deny defendants motion to dismiss that her motion must accept all factual allegations as true for failure to deny. 708 415 5055 led Samuel Sledge ? 907 N. Lawler / fp) on Chicago, Illinois 60651 Defendant was notified by e mail 5/25/2023 : OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE WHITE Seorciary of Sie nee] 6248-679-2 MAY 28, 2021 □ SABRIAN SLEDGE 4842 BUTTERFIELD HILLSIDE, I, e0i62 RE LOGIC RxyaMTNaTron ASSISTANCE LTp_ DEAR SIR OR MADAM: ~ CORPORATION TO TRANSAC? BUSINESS ty oe STRORITY FOR THE ABOVE NAMED IN THIS CONNECTION HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND CREDITED. SINCERELY, SECRETARY OF STATE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS SERVICES □ CORPORATION DIVISION TELEPHONE (217) 782-6951 LT pqusl , A. ff, UW An | f7 aver )! TS 29use, 91138 he given To Th ACTS rause Sf Of □□ □□ MAYOR " Melrose Park SS Man bo Mary Ann Paolantonio “TRUSTEES. CLERK Anthony N. Abruzzo Jaime Anguiano Arturo J. Moia Louis “Sonny” Nicotera Anthony J. Prignano Mary Ramirez-Tacon June 15,2021 Mid REGULAR & CERTIFIED Mar Samuel Sledge 907 N. Lawler Chicago, Hlnois 60651 Ke: Request for Re-Hearing □ Dear Mr. Sledge: The Village of Melrose Park is in receipt of a document dated Fone 9, 202] made fo the attention of the local liquor control commissioner for the Village of Melrose Park requesting a re-hearing of the May 24, 2621 “hearing * Kindly be advised that the meeting that occurred before the Village of Melrose Park Board of Trustees on May 24, 2021 was a Tegularly scheduled Village Board meeting which included consideration of your application for a business license, which was denied. Your application for a Melrose Park liquor license for a private social club was separately denied by the local liquor control commissioner for the Village of Melrose Park. Your purported request for a “re- hearing” js denied. A hearing on YOur initial application for a liquor license was not required under the Village’s Code of Ordinances or the ilinois Liquor Control Act. : Alar 3 loafer Ronald M. Serpico, 2” . Local Liquor Control Commissioner OEP EX h )by7 / here are ND ACTS Wy AThendéaTion Fo give Kyy —*F) _ eo Ao C17 706, (hr Cr Ore Unc OW STITY Tiana 2 MNS1s7HUI TO --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10149049. Public record. Not legal advice.