# Brown v. Doran

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 23, 2004 · 114 F. App'x 571

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1014833

## Case

- **Full name:** James T. BROWN, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. Robert M. DORAN; K. Keeley, Defendants—Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 23, 2004
- **Citations:** 114 F. App'x 571
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Luttig, Gregory, Hamilton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1014833

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1473

JAMES T. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT M. DORAN; K. KEELEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CA-02-1019-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James T. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Paula
Keyser Speck, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

James T. Brown appeals from the district court’s orders

dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s memorandum and opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Brown v. Doran, No. CA-02-1019-1 (M.D.N.C.

Dec. 3, 2003 & Feb. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1014833. Public record. Not legal advice.