# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 10, 2004

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1014709

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 10, 2004
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1014709

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7299

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERNEST BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge.
(CR-97-15-MJG)

Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Ernest Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

without prejudice the motion for reconsideration of the denial of

the motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Brown, No. CR-97-15-MJG (D. Md. July 16, 2004). To the extent

Brown seeks reconsideration in this court of the denial of the

motion for a certificate of appealability, we deny reconsideration.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1014709. Public record. Not legal advice.