# Hayes v. Board of Election for Baltimore City

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 19, 2003 · 82 F. App'x 849

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1012099

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert HAYES, Union for Black Alliance for the Homeless, Handicap, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BOARD OF ELECTION FOR BALTIMORE CITY; Electoral College Commission, Defendants—Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 19, 2003
- **Citations:** 82 F. App'x 849
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, Motz, Hamilton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1012099

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1844

ROBERT HAYES, union for black alliance for the
homeless, handicap,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BOARD OF ELECTION FOR BALTIMORE CITY;
ELECTORAL COLLEGE COMMISSION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
1678-1-AMD)

Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 19, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Hayes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Robert Hayes appeals the district court’s order dismissing as

frivolous his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Hayes v. Bd. of Election, No. CA-03-

1678-1-AMD (D. Md. filed June 17, 2003 & entered June 18, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1012099. Public record. Not legal advice.