# Brown v. Foster

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 24, 2003 · 78 F. App'x 875

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1011720

## Case

- **Full name:** Joseph G. BROWN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer FOSTER, Jailer, Fauquier County Sheriffs Department; Officer Stewart, Jailer, Fauquier County Sheriff’s Department; Sergeant Shorter, Officer in Charge, Fauquier County Sheriffs Department; David A. Flohr, Major of Jail Operations, Fauquier County Sheriff’s Department, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 24, 2003
- **Citations:** 78 F. App'x 875
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkinson, Williams, King
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1011720

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7221

JOSEPH G. BROWN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER FOSTER, Jailer, Fauquier County
Sheriff’s Department; OFFICER STEWART, Jailer,
Fauquier County Sheriff’s Department; SERGEANT
SHORTER, Officer in Charge, Fauquier County
Sheriff’s Department; DAVID A. FLOHR, Major of
Jail Operations, Fauquier County Sheriff’s
Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-03-494-2)

Submitted: October 8, 2003 Decided: October 24, 2003

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph G. Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Joseph G. Brown, Jr. appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Brown v. Foster, No. CA-03-494-2 (E.D. Va.

filed July 16, 2003; entered July 17, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1011720. Public record. Not legal advice.