# Brown v. Dewalt

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 10, 2003 · 74 F. App'x 276

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1011517

## Case

- **Full name:** Gerard Valmore BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden; Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondents-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 10, 2003
- **Citations:** 74 F. App'x 276
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, Shedd, Hamilton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1011517

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6939

GERARD VALMORE BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
PRISONS,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-03-371-H-5)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 10, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerard Valmore Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Gerard Valmore Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by of the

district court. See Brown v. DeWalt, No. CA-03-371-H-5 (E.D.N.C.

June 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1011517. Public record. Not legal advice.