# Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Mammoth Constructors, LLC

> District Court, M.D. Florida · May 10, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10112855

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, M.D. Florida
- **Decided:** May 10, 2023
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10112855

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION

AMERISURE MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Michigan corporation,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-108-JLB-KCD

MAMMOTH CONSTRUCTORS,
LLC and BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER
COUNTY,

Defendants.
/
ORDER
Plaintiff Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company has filed this
declaratory judgment action to settle its duty to indemnify its insured
Mammoth Constructors LLC for damages claimed in a state court lawsuit.
(Doc. 1.) The state court case is set for trial at the end of this month.
Defendants now seeks a stay of this proceeding pending the trial in state
court. (Doc. 20.) According to Defendants, a stay will avoid redundant litigation
and further judicial economy since “the state suit should address facts at the
heart of the insurance exclusions claimed by Amerisure.” (Id. at 4.) Amerisure
does not oppose the stay. (Id. at 6.)
“[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in
every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy

of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co.,
299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). A decision to stay is left to the discretion of the district
court. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997).
After considering Defendants’ arguments and the procedural posture of

this case, the Court agrees that a stay is appropriate. Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. Defendants’ Motion to Stay (Doc. 20) is GRANTED.
2. This case is stayed pending resolution of the state court litigation

referenced in Defendants’ motion.
3. If the state court trial is delayed or continued from its current
schedule, either party may petition the Court to lift the stay.
4. The parties are directed to file a joint notice regarding the status

of the state court litigation on June 20, 2023, and every thirty days thereafter
until the stay is lifted.
5. The Clerk is directed to add a stay flag to this case and cancel all
outstanding deadlines and hearings.
ENTERED in Fort Myers, Florida on May 10, 2023.

Me. Jai
Kile C. Dudek”
United States Magistrate Judge

Copies: All Parties of Record

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10112855. Public record. Not legal advice.