# Brown v. Edmonds

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 29, 2003

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1010661

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 29, 2003
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1010661

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6488

DEMARCUS M. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRETT EDMONDS; N. COMER; DANIEL BRAXTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-03-132-7)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demarcus M. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Demarcus M. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Edmonds, No. CA-

03-132-7 (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003 & entered Feb. 26, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1010661. Public record. Not legal advice.