# Kennedy v. Bre/Seaside Inn Owner L.L.C.

> District Court, M.D. Florida · May 11, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10105108

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, M.D. Florida
- **Decided:** May 11, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10105108

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION

PATRICIA KENNEDY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 2:19-cv-919-FtM-38NPM

BRE/SEASIDE INN OWNER L.L.C.,

Defendant.

ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Renewed Motion for Entry of Default, filed
on April 23, 2020. Plaintiff Patricia Kennedy requests the Court direct the Clerk to enter a
default against Defendant Bre/Seaside Inn Owner L.L.C. (Id). Defendant failed to respond
and the time to respond has lapsed.
Pursuant to Rule 55(a), “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative
relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend and that failure is shown by affidavit
or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Prior to
directing the Clerk of Court to enter a default, however, the Court must first determine
whether Plaintiffs properly effected service of process. Chambers v. Halsted Fin. Servs.,
LLC, No. 2:13-CV-809-FTM-38, 2014 WL 3721209, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2014).
Plaintiff has the burden of establishing effective service of process. See Zamperla, Inc. v.
S.B.F. S.R.L., No. 6:13-CV-1811-ORL-37, 2014 WL 1400641, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 10,
2014). Rule 4(l) provides, “unless service is waived, proof of service must be made to the
court. “
Service on an unincorporated entity can be made by any manner prescribed in
Rule 4(e)(1) or “by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an officer, a
managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to
receive service of process. . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1). Likewise, under state law, a limited

liability company may be served through its registered agent. Fla. Stat. § 48.062(1). And
§ 48.062(1) also provides that a person attempting service may serve process on any
employee of the registered agent on the first attempt at service. Id.
In the motion, Plaintiff asserts she effectively served process on Defendant by
serving an employee of the registered agent. (Doc. 15). The Amended Return of Service
(Doc. 14) confirms the process server served Christina Brown as an employee of the
Registered Agent. It appears service of process was effective. And Bre/Seaside Inn
Owner, L.L.C. has not answered or otherwise defended this action.
On April 3, 2020, the Court entered an Order to Show Cause why this case should
not be dismissed for failure to file a motion for clerk’s default. By filing the above motion,

Plaintiff satisfied the Order to Show Cause and the Court will discharge it.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:
(1) The Renewed Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. 15) is GRANTED and the
Clerk of Court is directed to enter a Clerk’s default against Bre/Seaside Inn
Owner, L.L.C.
(2) The Order to Show Cause (Doc. 13) is discharged.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on May 11, 2020.

Lida EC Line dL
NICHOLAS P. MIZEL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10105108. Public record. Not legal advice.