# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 17, 2003 · 57 F. App'x 588

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1010071

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie David BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 17, 2003
- **Citations:** 57 F. App'x 588
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkinson, Michael, King
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1010071

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6176

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE DAVID BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-93-264-V)

Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 17, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie David Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr.,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Willie David Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

his “motion to modify term of imprisonment” pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Brown, No. CR-93-264-V

(W.D.N.C. Dec. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1010071. Public record. Not legal advice.