# Zeger v. Board of Visitors

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 18, 2002 · 53 F. App'x 242

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1009311

## Case

- **Full name:** Jerald Jay ZEGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF VISITORS, THE NAVAL ACADEMY; Joseph Spinelli; Peter Firenzi; Michael Horean; Kerry Taylor; Monica Tomaszewski; Leah Se Los Reyes; Linda-MD Kirilenko; The Board of Regents, University of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 18, 2002
- **Citations:** 53 F. App'x 242
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, King, Gregory
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1009311

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1484

JERALD JAY ZEGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BOARD OF VISITORS, THE NAVAL ACADEMY; JOSEPH
SPINELLI; PETER FIRENZI; MICHAEL HOREAN; KERRY
TAYLOR; MONICA TOMASZEWSKI; LEAH SE LOS REYES;
LINDA-MD KIRILENKO; THE BOARD OF REGENTS,
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02-
652-MJG)

Submitted: November 18, 2002 Decided: December 18, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerald Jay Zeger, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Jerald Jay Zeger appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his civil rights complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zeger v. Board

of Visitors, No. CA-02-652-MJG (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1009311. Public record. Not legal advice.