# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 27, 2002

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1009124

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 27, 2002
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1009124

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6961

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY MACK BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-94-27, CA-99-346-7)

Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: November 27, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ellen Bowyer, TROUTMAN SANDERS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellant. Jean Barrett Hudson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Johnny M. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Brown has not made a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Brown,

Nos. CR-94-27; CA-99-346-7 (W.D. Va. June 16, 2000). Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1009124. Public record. Not legal advice.