# Murray v. Fairfax County School Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 14, 2002 · 50 F. App'x 626

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1009050

## Case

- **Full name:** Lisa MURRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 14, 2002
- **Citations:** 50 F. App'x 626
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkins, Luttig, Hamilton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1009050

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1794

LISA MURRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-02-14-A)

Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 14, 2002

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lisa Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Ardra Monique O’Neal, HUNTON &
WILLIAMS, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Lisa Murray appeals the district court’s order granting her

employer’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing her

discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court for the reasons stated from the bench. See Murray

v. Fairfax Cty. Sch. Bd., No. CA-02-14-A (E.D. Va. filed July 12,

2002 & entered July 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1009050. Public record. Not legal advice.
