# Brown v. Director Dept Corr

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 5, 2002

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1008326

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 5, 2002
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1008326

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6091

RONALD JEFFREY BROWN, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-405-3)

Submitted: July 15, 2002 Decided: August 5, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Adam Adamski, ADAMSKI & CONTI, Chicago, Illinois, for
Appellant. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Ronald Jeffrey Brown, III, seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

Brown v. Director Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-405-3 (E.D. Va.

Dec. 13, 2001). We deny Brown’s motion for oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1008326. Public record. Not legal advice.