# Brown v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 31, 2002 · 42 F. App'x 590

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1008268

## Case

- **Full name:** Elliott Roy BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; Secretary of the Air Force; Wilnet A. Brown; Jack B. Stevens, Circuit Court Judge, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 31, 2002
- **Citations:** 42 F. App'x 590
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkins, Motz, Traxler
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1008268

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1468

ELLIOTT ROY BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CIRCUIT COURT of FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA;
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE; WILNET A. BROWN;
JACK B. STEVENS, Circuit Court Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-1484-A)

Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elliott Roy Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Robert Messitt, James
Christian Stuchell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Elliott Roy Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

his claims of declaratory relief, accounting, and restitution. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Brown v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County,

No. CA-01-1484-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1008268. Public record. Not legal advice.