# Riley v. Vizcarra

> District Court, S.D. California · October 26, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10082261

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, S.D. California
- **Decided:** October 26, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10082261

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 SHANNON RILEY, Case No.: 3:18-cv-2911-JAH-AHG
12 Plaintiff, ORDER:

13 v.
(1) GRANTING IN PART AND
14 VIZCARRA, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC
15 Defendant.
CONFERENCE, and
16
(2) SETTING TELEPHONIC
17
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
18
[ECF No. 53]
19

20
21 Before the Court is Plaintiff Shannon Riley’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Telephonic
22 Conference. ECF No. 53. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil
23 complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 relating to incidents that occurred while
24 incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego, California.
25 ECF No. 24. In the instant motion, Plaintiff requests (1) a telephonic status conference
26 regarding discovery and (2) the opportunity for settlement negotiations. ECF No. 53
27 at 1–2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN
28 PART Plaintiff’s motion.
1 I. BACKGROUND
2 Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint, the operative pleading in this action,
3 on January 13, 2020. ECF No. 24. Defendants moved to dismiss certain claims from the
4 Second Amended Complaint, which Plaintiff opposed. ECF Nos. 28, 32. The Court
5 dismissed all claims in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, except the First and Eighth
6 Amendment claims against Defendant Vizcarra arising from a March 18, 2018 incident.
7 ECF No. 37. On July 2, 2020, Defendant filed an Answer to the surviving claims in
8 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 38. Accordingly, on July 7, 2020, the
9 Court issued its Scheduling Order regulating discovery and other pre-trial proceedings.
10 ECF No. 39. In its Scheduling Order, the Court explained that:
11 All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by January 11, 2021.
“Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules
12
of Civil Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated
13 a sufficient period of time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be
completed by the cut-off date, taking into account the times for service, notice
14
and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel
15 shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all discovery
disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). A failure to comply in this
16
regard will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an order of
17 the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be
recognized by the court. The Court expects counsel to make every effort to
18
resolve all disputes without court intervention through the meet and confer
19 process. If the parties reach an impasse on any discovery issue, Defendant
must e-mail chambers at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov no later than 45
20
days after the date of service of the written discovery response that is in
21 dispute, seeking a telephonic conference with the Court to discuss the
discovery dispute. The email must include: (1) at least three proposed times
22
mutually agreed upon by the parties for the telephonic conference; (2) a
23 neutral statement of the dispute; and (3) one sentence describing (not arguing)
each parties’ position. The movant must copy opposing counsel on the email.
24
No discovery motion may be filed until the Court has conducted its pre-motion
25 telephonic conference, unless the movant has obtained leave of Court. All
parties are ordered to read and to fully comply with the Chambers Rules of
26
Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard[.]
27
ECF No. 39 at 2 (emphasis modified). This Order follows.
28
1 II. DISCUSSION
2 In Plaintiff’s instant motion, he requests a telephonic conference regarding
3 discovery, and the opportunity to “reach a speedier resolution.” ECF No. 53 at 1–2. The
4 Court will address these in turn.
5 A. Discovery Teleconference
6 Plaintiff correctly notes that the Court issued its Scheduling Order in July, which
7 stated that fact discovery must be completed by January 11, 2021. ECF 53 at 1; see ECF
8 No. 39 at 2. However, Plaintiff’s contention that “almost three months have since passed
9 and this court has yet to hold said telephonic conference[,]” which indicates a belief that
10 discovery is predicated on a telephonic conference, is misinformed. Compare ECF 53 at 1
11 with ECF No. 39 at 2. The pre-motion teleconference is required before filing a discovery
12 dispute motion, not before propounding discovery requests—i.e., the Court does require
13 that the parties alert the Court to any discovery disputes via teleconference before filing
14 any motion, but the Court does not require the parties alert the Court when conducting
15 routine discovery. ECF No. 39 at 2. Here, Plaintiff has not represented to the Court that
16 there are any discovery disputes at issue, and thus the Court DENIES his request for a
17 discovery dispute teleconference without prejudice to refiling should a dispute arise. The
18 Court reiterates that a telephonic conference is not needed before conducting
19 discovery; the parties are, and have been, free to propound discovery requests to each
20 other in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
21 B. Opportunity to Discuss Settlement
22 Plaintiff also requests an opportunity to discuss settlement, and notes that he “is
23 willing to forego discovery in an effort to possibly reach a speedier resolution.” ECF No.
24 53 at 2. Before issuing its Scheduling Order, the Court did not conduct an Early Neutral
25 Evaluation or Case Management Conference in this case, pursuant to Civil Local Rule
26 16.1(e). ECF No. 39 at 1. Given Plaintiff’s representations in his motion, upon a review of
27 the current status of the case, and good cause appearing, the Court, in its discretion, has
28 determined that a telephonic settlement conference is appropriate at this stage of the case.
1 Therefore, Plaintiff’s request for a telephonic settlement conference is GRANTED, and
2 the Court SETS a Settlement Conference for December 11, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. before the
3 Honorable Allison H. Goddard. To facilitate the conference, the Court ORDERS as
4 follows:
5 1. For Settlement Conferences, the Court customarily requires personal
6 attendance of all parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured
7 defendants, and the primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation. However, since
8 Plaintiff is incarcerated in a penal institution, and due to the current COVID-19 public
9 emergency,1 both sides may appear for the Settlement Conference telephonically rather
10 than in person. Therefore, all named parties, party representatives, including claims
11 adjusters for insured defendants, as well as principal attorney(s) responsible for the
12 litigation must attend via teleconference. All who attend the conference must be legally
13 and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case. Counsel appearing without their
14 clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority) will be subject to
15 immediate imposition of sanctions.
16
17

18
19 1 On March 23, 2020, Chief Judge Larry A. Burns amended his original Order in response
to the COVID-19 public emergency, which, among other things, excuses personal
20
appearance of counsel and parties at civil court proceedings and notes that judges retain
21 discretion to hold civil proceedings telephonically. See CJO #18-A at ¶ 4B. His original
order, CJO #18, is available on the Court website at
22
https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/_assets/pdf/rules/Order%20of%20the%20Chief%20Judge
23 %2018.pdf. His amended order, CJO #18-A, which amends paragraph four of CJO #18, is
available on the Court website at
24
https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/_assets/pdf/rules/Order%20of%20the%20Chief%20Judge
25 %2018-a.pdf. These orders were extended until mid-November by CJO #47, which is
available on the Court website at
26
https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/_assets/pdf/rules/Order%20of%20the%20Chief%20Judge
27 %2047%20-%20Proceedings%20During%20the%20Covid-
19%20Public%20Emergency.pdf.
28
1 2. Although the Court has tentatively reserved the date and time with the North
2 Kern State Prison, counsel for Defendant must contact the correctional facility to make any
3 further arrangements necessary to ensure Plaintiff’s appearance by telephone.
4 3. The Court authorizes both parties to call the chambers teleconference line at
5 1-877-873-8018 and use 8367902 as the access code on the day of the conference.
6 4. Full settlement authority is required. A party or party representative with full
7 and complete authority to enter into a binding settlement must be present at the
8 Settlement Conference. Full authority to settle means that a person must be authorized to
9 fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable
10 to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th
11 Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the
12 settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D.
13 Ariz. 2003). One of the purposes of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority
14 to attend the conference is that the person’s view of the case may be altered during the
15 face-to-face conference. Id. at 486. Limited or sum certain authority is not adequate. Nick
16 v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595–97 (8th Cir. 2001). A person who needs to
17 call another person who is not present before agreeing to any settlement does not have
18 full authority.
19 5. Defendant’s counsel must provide Plaintiff with its mailing address by
20 October 29, 2020.
21 6. Plaintiff must serve on Defendant a written settlement proposal, to the
22 mailing address provided, which must include a specific demand amount, no later than
23 November 9, 2020. Defendant must respond to Plaintiff in writing with a specific offer
24 amount by November 20, 2020. The parties should not file or otherwise copy the Court
25 on these exchanges. Rather, the parties must include their written settlement proposals in
26 their respective Settlement Conference Statements to the Court. The Court waives its meet
27 and confer requirement for this settlement conference.
28
1 7. Each party must prepare a Settlement Conference Statement, which will be
2 served on opposing counsel and lodged with the Court no later than December 3, 2020.
3 Defendant’s Statement must be lodged in .pdf format via email to
4 efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov (not filed). Plaintiff’s Statement may be mailed to:
5 Chambers of Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard
221 West Broadway, Suite 3142
6
San Diego, California 92101
7
The substance of the Settlement Conference Statement must comply fully with the Judge
8
Goddard’s Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules (located at
9
https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/goddard/docs/Goddard%20Mandatory%20Settlem
10
ent%20Conference%20Rules.pdf and attached to this Order for Plaintiff’s convenience).
11
8. Each party may also prepare an optional Confidential Settlement Letter for
12
the Court’s review only, to be lodged with the Court no later than December 3, 2020.
13
Defendant’s Letter must be lodged in .pdf format via email to
14
efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov (not filed). Plaintiff may mail his Letter to the address
15
provided above. Should a party choose to prepare a Letter, the substance of the Settlement
16
Conference Letter must comply fully with the Judge Goddard’s Mandatory Settlement
17
Conference Rules (located at the link above and attached to this Order for Plaintiff’s
18
convenience).
19
9. All parties are ordered to read and to fully comply with the Chambers Rules
20
and Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules of Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard
21
(attached hereto), except as explicitly modified by this Order.
22
/ /
23
/ /
24
/ /
25
/ /
26
/ /
27
/ /
28
1 CONCLUSION
2 For the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN
3 || PART Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 53) as follows:
4 1. The Court denies Plaintiff’s request for a discovery dispute teleconference
5 || without prejudice to refiling should a dispute arise.
6 2. The Court grants Plaintiff’s request for an opportunity to settle his case, and
7 ||sets a telephonic Settlement Conference for December 11, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. before the
8 || Honorable Allison H. Goddard.
9
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11 Dated: October 26, 2020
1 _ AnwioenH.
Honorable Allison H. Goddard
13 United States Magistrate Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
ATTACHMENTS:
2

3

4
CIVIL PRETRIAL PROCEDURES (“CHAMBERS RULES”) FOR
5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLISON H. GODDARD

6
and
7
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE REQUIREMENTS FOR
8
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLISON H. GODDARD
9

10

11

12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 CIVIL PRETRIAL PROCEDURES (“CHAMBERS RULES”) FOR
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLISON H. GODDARD
2

3 The Court provides this information for general guidance to counsel and litigants. The
Court may modify these procedures as appropriate in any case upon request or on its own.
4

5 Civility and Professionalism. All counsel who appear before the Court must review
CivLR 2.1 and, at all times, act in compliance with the Code of Conduct set forth in that
6
rule.
7
Communications with Chambers. Letters, faxes, and emails to chambers are prohibited
8
unless specifically requested by the Court. Telephone calls to chambers are permitted only
9 for non-substantive matters such as scheduling and calendaring. Court personnel are
prohibited from giving legal advice or discussing the merits of a case.
10

11 Early Neutral Evaluation Conferences. The Court will schedule an ENE at the outset of
the case, typically after all parties have answered. The ENE is informal and confidential.
12
Counsel must carefully review the order scheduling the ENE for more information,
13 including directions regarding briefing and requirements for personal attendance by the
parties.
14

15 Case Management Conferences. The Court typically conducts the CMC required under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and CivLR 16.1 immediately following the ENE if no settlement is
16
reached. Prior to the initial CMC, the parties must lodge a Joint CMC Statement with the
17 Court at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov that complies with the Court’s Requirements
for Joint Case Management Statements
18
(https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/goddard/docs/Goddard%20Joint%20Case%20Ma
19 nagement%20Statement%20Rules.pdf). The Court may schedule additional status
conferences following the initial CMC. The parties are not required to file a joint report in
20
advance of a status conference unless specifically ordered by the Court.
21
Scheduling Order. The Court will issue a Scheduling Order following the CMC.
22
Modification of the Scheduling Order requires the approval of the Court, which will only
23 be granted on a showing of good cause.

24
Telephonic Appearances. Attorneys located outside the Southern District of California
25 may only appear by telephone with leave of Court, which will not be granted absent a
showing of good cause. An attorney appearing telephonically at a hearing may only listen
26
to the hearing and may not present argument by telephone.
27
Motions to Seal. There is a presumptive right of public access to court records based upon
28
1 common law and the First Amendment. The Court will scrutinize any request to file
information under seal, and a request will only be granted if a specific showing is made
2
that justifies sealing. Generic and vague references to “competitive harm” will almost
3 always be insufficient to justify sealing.

4
Joint Motions. Any administrative request to the Court (i.e., extension of time,
5 continuance of ENE, etc.) should be made to the Court by joint motion. If only one party
is making the request and the other party or parties do not oppose, they should indicate that
6
in the joint motion. If the other party or parties oppose the request, they should set forth
7 their position in the joint motion. Ex parte applications are disfavored, and any unopposed
request should be filed as a joint motion rather than an ex parte application. Counsel who
8
force an ex parte application by refusing to participate in the filing of a joint motion will
9 be subject to sanctions.

10
Requests for Continuances. All requests for continuances must be made by a joint motion
11 no less than seven calendar days before the affected date. The request must state:
• The original deadline or date;
12
• The number of previous requests for continuances;
13 • A showing of good cause for the request;
14 • Whether the request is opposed and why;
• Whether the requested continuance will affect other case management dates; and
15
• A declaration from the counsel seeking the continuance that describes the steps taken
16 to comply with the existing deadlines, and the specific reasons why the deadlines
cannot be met.
17
• Should the parties request a continuance based on the plan to pursue private
18 mediation, in addition to the joint motion outlined above, the parties shall also lodge
(not file) a Joint Mediation Plan via email at
19
efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov on the same date they filed the joint motion. The joint
20 plan must state:
A. The firm date of mediation;
21
B. The identity of the mediator;
22 C. A complete list of informal discovery the parties agree to exchange
before mediation; and
23
D. A firm deadline by which the parties will exchange the informal
24 discovery.

25
Discovery Disputes. The parties must meet and confer in an attempt to resolve any
26 discovery disputes before contacting the Court. After meet and confer attempts have failed,
the movant must e-mail chambers at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov seeking a
27
telephonic conference with the Court to discuss the discovery dispute. The email must
28 include: (1) at least three proposed times mutually agreed upon by the parties for the
1 telephonic conference; (2) a neutral statement of the dispute; and (3) one sentence
describing (not arguing) each parties’ position. The movant must copy opposing counsel
2
on the email.
3
No discovery motion may be filed until the Court has conducted its pre-motion telephonic
4
conference, unless the movant has obtained leave of Court. The Court may strike any
5 discovery motion that is filed without complying with this process.

6
This process does not apply where a party is in custody and is proceeding pro se. In that
7 case, counsel may contact chambers by telephone to obtain a hearing date on a noticed
discovery motion.
8

9 If a dispute arises during the course of a deposition, counsel must meet and confer prior to
seeking any ruling from the Court. After meet and confer attempts have failed, counsel
10
may call chambers to seek a ruling. If the Court is unable to review the matter at that
11 moment, counsel should proceed with the deposition in other areas of inquiry and the Court
will respond as soon as practicable.
12

13 Deadline to Raise Discovery Disputes With the Court. The parties must bring any
discovery dispute to the Court’s attention (either by email or filing a motion as outlined
14
above) no later than 45 days after either (1) the date of service of the written discovery
15 response that is in dispute; or (2) the date that the portion of the deposition transcript in
dispute is completed. Failure to meet this deadline will bar a party from filing a
16
corresponding discovery motion. The parties must file a joint motion demonstrating good
17 cause if they seek to extend this deadline. The parties cannot extend this deadline by any
agreement that is not approved by the Court.
18

19 Stipulated Protective Orders. Any protective order submitted for the Court’s signature
must contain the following two provisions:
20

21 1. No document shall be filed under seal unless counsel secures a court order allowing
the filing of a document, or portion thereof, under seal. An application to file a
22
document under seal shall be served on opposing counsel, and on the person or entity
23 that has custody and control of the document, if different from opposing counsel. If
opposing counsel, or the person or entity who has custody and control of the
24
document, wishes to oppose the application, they must contact the chambers of the
25 judge who will rule on the application to notify the Court that an opposition to the
application will be filed.
26

27 2. The Court may modify the protective order sua sponte in the interests of justice or
for public policy reasons.
28
1
The Court recommends that the stipulated protective order contain a provision regarding
2
the disposition of confidential or sealed documents and information after the case is closed.
3
All stipulated protective orders must be filed as a joint motion. The parties must email a
4
copy of the proposed order in Word format to
5 efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov.

6
Notice of Settlement. If the parties reach a settlement, counsel must promptly file a Notice
7 of Settlement or an appropriate Motion to Dismiss. If a scheduled date with the Court is
imminent, counsel must also contact chambers to advise of the settlement. Once a Notice
8
of Settlement is filed, the Court will schedule a telephonic Settlement Disposition
9 Conference, which will be taken off calendar once the case has been dismissed.

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
1 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE REQUIREMENTS FOR
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLISON H. GODDARD
2

3 1. Discovery: Counsel shall ensure that any discovery necessary to evaluate the case
for settlement purposes is completed by the date of the Settlement Conference.
4
Counsel shall cooperate in providing discovery informally and expeditiously.
5
2. Plaintiff Must Make a Formal Settlement Proposal: No later than 21 days
6
before the conference, the plaintiff must serve on the defendant a written
7 settlement proposal, which must include a specific demand amount. The defendant
must respond to the plaintiff in writing with a specific offer amount prior to the
8
Meet and Confer discussion. The parties should not file or otherwise copy the
9 Court on these exchanges. Rather, the parties must include their written settlement
proposals in their respective Settlement Conference Statements to the Court.
10

11 3. Who Must Attend: Lead trial counsel shall appear at the conference with the
parties. Any party who is not a natural person shall be represented by the person(s)
12
with full authority to negotiate a settlement. An insured party shall appear with a
13 representative of the carrier with full authority to negotiate up to the limits of
coverage. A person who needs to call another person who is not present before
14
agreeing to any settlement does not have full authority. Personal attendance of a
15 party is mandatory and will only be excused upon a written request that is timely
under the circumstances and demonstrates extraordinary hardship.
16

17 4. Meet and Confer Requirement: Counsel for the parties must meet and confer (in
person or by phone, not by email) to discuss the following matters no later than
18
14 days before the Settlement Conference:
19
A. Who will attend the conference on behalf of each party, including
20
counsel, client representatives with full authority to make final decisions
21 regarding any settlement offer, and any insurance representatives.

22
B. Identification of any persons or entities, such as a board of directors,
23 who must approve a proposed settlement agreement before it can be
executed, as well as the nature and duration of any such approval process.
24

25 C. Insurance coverage available to cover all or part of the claimed losses
or to fund all or part of any party’s defense, and status of any tenders for
26
coverage.
27
5. Settlement Conference Statements and Confidential Settlement Letters: Each
28
1 party shall prepare a Settlement Conference Statement that will be exchanged with
the other parties. Each party may also prepare an optional Confidential Settlement
2
Letter that will be for the Court’s review only. Both the Statement and the Letter
3 must be lodged in .pdf format via email to efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov (not
filed), and must be received no later than 10 calendar days prior to the conference.
4
The Settlement Conference Statement must be served on opposing counsel.
5
6. Contents of Settlement Conference Statement: The Settlement Conference
6
Statement shall not exceed 10 pages of text and 20 pages of exhibits. Exhibits must
7 be bookmarked within the .pdf file. The Settlement Conference Statement shall
include the following:
8

9 A. Substance of the Suit

10
i. A brief statement of the facts of the case.
11
ii. The claims and defenses, including the statutory or other
12
grounds upon which the claims are founded.
13
iii. A summary of the proceedings to date, including a list of
14
the motions previously made, their dispositions, and any pending
15 motions.

16
iv. A statement of facts not reasonably in dispute.
17
v. A list of the key facts in dispute and the specific evidence
18
relevant to a determination of those facts.
19
vi. Any discrete issue that, if resolved, would facilitate the
20
resolution of the case.
21
vii. A brief statement of the issues of law with respect to
22
liability and damages. The statement must be supported by legal
23 authority, but extended legal argument is not necessary.

24
B. Relief Sought. A statement of the relief sought, including an
25 itemization of damages and any other non-monetary relief.

26
C. Settlement Discussions/Proposal and Response. Except to the extent
27 prohibited by applicable rules of privilege, describe the history and status of
any settlement negotiations.
28
1
7. Additional Settlement Information: The parties must submit the additional
2
information below either in the Settlement Conference Statement or the
3 Confidential Settlement Letter. The Confidential Settlement Letter may not exceed
5 pages of text.
4

5 A. Settlement Analysis:

6
i. For each principal claim and defense, a forthright
7 evaluation of the strengths, weaknesses, likelihood of prevailing, and
key legal authorities.
8

9 ii. The party’s perspective regarding why parties’
assessments of the settlement value of the case differ.
10

11 B. Litigation Costs: A statement of litigation costs and attorney fees
incurred to date, as well as the estimated costs, fees, and time projected for
12
further discovery, pretrial proceedings, and trial. If a party seeks attorney
13 fees and costs, that party shall provide the legal basis for the claim and
sufficient information to evaluate the amount of fees claimed.
14

15 C. Other Information: Include any other information that might be
pertinent to settlement, including the following:
16

17 i. What needs of your client must be met for the parties to
reach a settlement?
18

19 ii. What needs of the opposing party must be met to reach
a settlement?
20

21 iii. A description of the main obstacles (factual, legal, or
other) to reaching agreement, and what might be done to solve them.
22

23 iv. Do you have enough information to discuss settlement
and, if not, what additional information is needed?
24

25 v. What are the consequences to each side if no settlement
is reached?
26

27 D. A realistic settlement figure or terms that, given all the circumstances,
the party submitting the Confidential Settlement Letter would consider
28
1 seriously.

2
E. Where the party is insured or is a governmental entity, any foreseeable
3 barriers to insurance coverage or approval of a proposed settlement, or
special concerns that the insurer or governmental entity might want
4
addressed.
5
8. Further Settlement Conferences:
6

7 A. Updated Statements: Unless explicitly relieved of this requirement,
the parties shall lodge updated Settlement Conference Statements 10 days
8
prior to the further Settlement Conference, in accordance with Sections 6
9 and 7, to inform the Court of the status of the action and any developments
that have occurred since the last Settlement Conference.
10

11 B. Confidential Settlement Letters: The parties may also lodge updated
Confidential Settlement Letters in accordance with Section 7.
12

13 9. Notification of Settlement: If the case settles prior to the Settlement Conference,
the parties shall immediately file a notice of settlement and notify Judge Goddard’s
14
chambers at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov.
15
10. Confidentiality: Parties are encouraged to discuss their case in a respectful and
16
candid manner. To facilitate this, any statements made during the conference will
17 not be admissible at trial.

18

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10082261. Public record. Not legal advice.