# Brown v. Gal

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 2, 2002 · 39 F. App'x 942

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1008224

## Case

- **Full name:** Bobby L. BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steven J. GAL, Warden; United States of America, Respondents-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 2, 2002
- **Citations:** 39 F. App'x 942
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkins, Motz, Traxler
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1008224

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6745

BOBBY L. BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STEVEN J. GAL, Warden; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-02-840-20BD)

Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 2, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby L. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Bobby L. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motions for appointment of

counsel and production of documents and affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Brown v. Gal, No. CA-02-840-20BD (D.S.C. Apr.

19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1008224. Public record. Not legal advice.