# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 10, 2002 · 36 F. App'x 159

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1007774

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lamont BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 10, 2002
- **Citations:** 36 F. App'x 159
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Widener, Gregory, Hamilton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1007774

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6520

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LAMONT BROWN,

Defendant- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-94-100, CA-02-63-2)

Submitted: May 9, 2002 Decided: June 10, 2002

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamont Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Lamont Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, Nos.

CR-94-100; CA-02-63-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1007774. Public record. Not legal advice.