# Erdmann-Browning v. Vilsack

> District Court, N.D. California · September 14, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10076476

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, N.D. California
- **Decided:** September 14, 2023
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10076476

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 ANIKA OKJE ERDMANN-BROWNING, Case No. 23-cv-04678-JST
et al.,
8
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING EX PARTE
9 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
v. RESTRAINING ORDER WITHOUT
10 PREJUDICE; DEFERRING RULING
THOMAS J. VILSACK, et al., ON APPLICATION FOR
11 PROVISIONAL CLASS
Defendants. CERTIFICATION; AND SETTING
12 HEARING ON MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
13
Re: ECF Nos. 11, 12
14
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Anika Okje Erdmann-Browning and Jacqueline Benitez’s ex
15
parte application for provisional class certification, ECF No. 11, and ex parte motion for a
16
temporary restraining order and an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not
17
issue, ECF No. 12.
18
The Court denies the motion for temporary restraining order without prejudice and defers a
19
ruling on the motion for provisional class certification. Plaintiffs have not “clearly show[n] that
20
immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse
21
party can be heard in opposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1). Although Defendants submitted a
22
truncated response to Plaintiffs’ motion one day after that motion was filed, Defendants have not
23
yet had “reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard,” Parcel Pending, Inc. v. Johanides, No.
24
SACV 21-01165-CJC(JDEx), 2021 WL 4913297, at *3 (C.D. Cal. July 13, 2021), and their
25
request for additional time to file a fuller response is justified under the circumstances.
26
The Court sets a hearing on Plaintiffs’ request for an injunction and motion for provisional
27
class certification on September 27, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. Defendants’ opposition is due September
1 20, 2023. Plaintiffs’ reply is due September 22, 2023. The Court also sets a case management
2 conference on September 19, 2023 at 9:30 a.m.
3 Unless the Court orders otherwise, both the motion hearing and the case management
4 || conference will proceed by Zoom.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated: September 14, 2023 .
JON S. TIGA
8 nited States District Judge
9
10
ll
a 12

13
14

15
16
€
= 17
6
Zz 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10076476. Public record. Not legal advice.