# Coleman v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 5, 2002 · 30 F. App'x 187

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1006871

## Case

- **Full name:** Anthony S. COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. BROWN, Deputy Sheriff; Wayne Markham, Food Director; Michael Wade, Sheriff; R. Garrison, Grievance Coordinator & Hearing Officer; Michelle Bentley, Kitchen Employee, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 5, 2002
- **Citations:** 30 F. App'x 187
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkins, Motz, Traxler
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1006871

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7715

ANTHONY S. COLEMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. BROWN, Deputy Sheriff; WAYNE MARKHAM, Food
Director; MICHAEL WADE, Sheriff; R. GARRISON,
Grievance Coordinator & Hearing Officer;
MICHELLE BENTLEY, Kitchen Employee,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-01-714-AM)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 5, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony S. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Anthony S. Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Coleman v. Brown, No. CA-01-714-AM (E.D. Va.

filed Sept. 17, 2001 and entered Sept. 18, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1006871. Public record. Not legal advice.