# Coleman v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 29, 2002 · 26 F. App'x 290

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1006488

## Case

- **Full name:** Anthony S. COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Z. BROWN, Deputy, Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 29, 2002
- **Citations:** 26 F. App'x 290
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkins, King, Hamilton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1006488

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7660

ANTHONY S. COLEMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Z. BROWN, Deputy,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.
(CA-01-934-AM)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony S. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Anthony S. Coleman, a Virginia state inmate, appeals the dis-

trict court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West

Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Coleman v.

Brown, No. CA-01-934-AM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 4, 2001; entered

Sept. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1006488. Public record. Not legal advice.
