# Brown v. Pitt County Schools

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 25, 2002 · 25 F. App'x 201

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1006399

## Case

- **Full name:** Calvin Earl BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS; Doris R. Grubbs, Coordinator Classified Personnel; Jodi Rittenhouse, Teacher, Stokes Elementary Schools; Steve Jones, Principal; Shirley Grimsley, Teacher, Ayden Middle School; Clifton G. Moore, Principal, Ayden Middle School, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 25, 2002
- **Citations:** 25 F. App'x 201
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkins, King, Hamilton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1006399

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2537

CALVIN EARL BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS; DORIS R. GRUBBS, Coordi-
nator Classified Personnel; JODI RITTENHOUSE,
Teacher, Stokes Elementary Schools; STEVE
JONES, Principal; SHIRLEY GRIMSLEY, Teacher,
Ayden Middle School; CLIFTON G. MOORE, Prin-
cipal, Ayden Middle School,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-00-21-4-H)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 25, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Alexander Soo, Lisa
M. Lukasik, THARRINGTON, SMITH, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Earl Brown appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion to reconsider, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), the

dismissal of his employment discrimination action. We have re-

viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Brown v. Pitt County Sch., No. CA-00-21-4-H

(E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1006399. Public record. Not legal advice.