# Smith v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 28, 2001 · 22 F. App'x 205

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005954

## Case

- **Full name:** Marvin L. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kelly BROWN; James Dunlap; Bill Forbes, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 28, 2001
- **Citations:** 22 F. App'x 205
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkins, Michael, King
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005954

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7505

MARVIN L. SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

KELLY BROWN; JAMES DUNLAP; BILL FORBES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-287-2)

Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 28, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin L. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Marvin L. Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Brown, No. CA-01-

287-2 (S.D.W. Va. July 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

and deny Smith’s motions for transcript at government expense and

to proceed in forma pauperis because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005954. Public record. Not legal advice.