# (PC) Brown v. Sherman

> District Court, E.D. California · November 6, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10056908

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** November 6, 2023
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10056908

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 LEON BROWN, Case No.: 1:21-cv-1327 JLT CDB (PC)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE
13 v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND
DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO
14 STUART SHERMAN, et al., CLOSE THE CASE

15 Defendants. (Doc. 17)

16
17 Plaintiff seeks to hold defendants liable for violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42
18 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20 On October 16, 2023, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to comply with the
21 Court’s order to file an amended complaint and failed to prosecute this action, and recommended
22 the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 17.) The Court granted Plaintiff fourteen days to
23 file any objections and informed him that the “failure to file objections within the specified time
24 may result in waiver of his rights on appeal.” (Id. at 4, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834,
25 839 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections and the deadline to do so expired.
26 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court performed a de novo review of this
27 case. Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the Findings and
1 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on October 16, 2023 (Doc. 17) are
2 ADOPTED in full.
3 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
4 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
5
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 | Dated: _November 6, 2023 Cerin | Tower
TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10056908. Public record. Not legal advice.