# Brown v. Hobbs

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 9, 2001

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005564

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 9, 2001
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005564

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7154

JAMES EDWARD BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

D. L. HOBBS, Warden, Jesup FCI,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-2173-7-13BG)

Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: October 9, 2001

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

James Edward Brown appeals the district court order adopting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (1994) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the

record, the district court order and the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation and affirm. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005564. Public record. Not legal advice.