# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 15, 2001 · 16 F. App'x 232

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005091

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kermit C. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 15, 2001
- **Citations:** 16 F. App'x 232
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, Motz, Gregory
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005091

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6688

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KERMIT C. BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CR-98-47)

Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 15, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kermit C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Kermit C. Brown appeals from the district court’s orders

denying Brown’s motion for transcripts and other documents from his

criminal trial and declining to reconsider that order. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Brown, No. CR-98-47 (E.D. Va.

Mar. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005091. Public record. Not legal advice.