# Nichols v. Caroline County Board of Education

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 7, 2001 · 15 F. App'x 156

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005049

## Case

- **Full name:** Norman L. NICHOLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAROLINE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 7, 2001
- **Citations:** 15 F. App'x 156
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Luttig, Motz, King
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005049

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1010

NORMAN L. NICHOLS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAROLINE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District
Judge. (CA-99-3352-H)

Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 7, 2001

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman L. Nichols, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steven David Frenkil,
Stephanie Renae DeKraai, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Norman L. Nichols, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant on Nichols’ claim of racial

discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nichols v. Caroline

County Bd. of Educ., No. CA-99-3352-H (D. Md. Nov. 28, 2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1005049. Public record. Not legal advice.