# (SS) Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

> District Court, E.D. California · November 18, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10048693

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** November 18, 2022
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10048693

## Opinion text

1
Jonathan O. Peña, Esq.
2 CA Bar ID No.: 278044
Peña & Bromberg, PLC
3 2440 Tulare St., Ste. 320
Fresno, CA 93721
4
Telephone: 559-439-9700
5 Facsimile: 559-439-9723
Email: info@jonathanpena.com
6 Attorney for Plaintiff, Anita Brown

7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
ANITA BROWN, Case No. 1:21-cv-00214-EPG
11
Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD
12 AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND
v. EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL
13
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security, (ECF No. 29).
15
Defendant.
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel,
17
subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount
18
of NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($9,000.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act
19
(EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and cost in the amount of ZERO dollars ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. §1920.
20
This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel
21 in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
22 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the
23 matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586,
24 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on
25 whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the
26 Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine
27 whether they are subject to any offset.
1 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that
2 Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses
3 and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any
4 payments made shall be delivered and made payable to Plaintiff’s counsel, Jonathan O. Peña.
5 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney
fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or
6
otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any
7
and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA
8
attorney fees in connection with this action.
9
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel’s firm to seek Social
10
Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the
11
EAJA.
12
Respectfully submitted,
13

14
Dated: November 17, 2022 /s/ Jonathan O. Peña
15 J ONATHAN O. PEÑA
Attorney for Plaintiff
16

17 Dated: November 17, 2022 PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
18 MATHEW W. PILE
Associate General Counsel
19
Office of Program Litigation
20 Social Security Administration

21 By: _*_Oscar Gonzalez de Llano
Oscar Gonzalez de Llano
22
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
23 Attorneys for Defendant
(*Permission to use electronic signature
24 obtained via email on November 17, 2022).
25

26
27
1 ORDER
2 Based upon the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 29), IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in
3 || the amount of $9000.00 as authorized by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no
4 || costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the stipulation.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.

7|| Dated: _ November 18, 2022 [Je hey
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10048693. Public record. Not legal advice.