# Esteban v. Prince William County School Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 13, 2001 · 13 F. App'x 73

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004630

## Case

- **Full name:** Deena ESTEBAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 13, 2001
- **Citations:** 13 F. App'x 73
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkins, Williams, King
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004630

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2480

DEENA ESTEBAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.
(CA-00-979-A)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 13, 2001

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard E. Gardiner, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Mary
McGowan, SICILIANO, ELLIS, DYER & BOCCAROSSE, Fairfax, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Deena Esteban appeals the district court’s order denying re-

lief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Esteban v. Prince William County, No. CA-

00-979-A (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 13, 2000; entered Oct. 16, 2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004630. Public record. Not legal advice.