# Brown v. Doss

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 23, 2001 · 11 F. App'x 135

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004228

## Case

- **Full name:** John Wayne BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Captain DOSS; Officer Carter; Officer Duval; Officer Mason; Officer Edwards; Officer Larimore; Officer West; Robin Hogge, Lieutenant; John Doe, Officer; Jane Doe, Officer; Major Diggs; Sheriff Stanaway, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 23, 2001
- **Citations:** 11 F. App'x 135
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, Williams, Gregory
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004228

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6338

JOHN WAYNE BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAPTAIN DOSS; OFFICER CARTER; OFFICER DUVAL;
OFFICER MASON; OFFICER EDWARDS; OFFICER LARI-
MORE; OFFICER WEST; ROBIN HOGGE, Lieutenant;
JOHN DOE, Officer; JANE DOE, Officer; MAJOR
DIGGS; SHERIFF STANAWAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-99-1442-A)

Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 23, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Wayne Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

John Wayne Brown appeals from a district court order dismiss-

ing without prejudice his complaint alleging civil rights viola-

tions under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion for appoint-

ment of counsel on appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See Brown v. Doss, No. CA-99-1442-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 9,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004228. Public record. Not legal advice.