# Brown v. Angelone

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 17, 2001 · 12 F. App'x 113

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004138

## Case

- **Full name:** David Brandon BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 17, 2001
- **Citations:** 12 F. App'x 113
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, Williams, Gregory
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004138

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7748

DAVID BRANDON BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-00-462-2)

Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 17, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Brandon Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker, Assis-
tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

David Brandon Brown seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000).* We have reviewed the record and the

magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Brown v.

Angelone, No. CA-00-462-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004138. Public record. Not legal advice.