# Brown v. Lynn Ladder & Scaffolding Co.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 20, 2001 · 11 F. App'x 122

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004073

## Case

- **Full name:** Judy BROWN, as Mother and Next Friend of John Travis Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LYNN LADDER & SCAFFOLDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 20, 2001
- **Citations:** 11 F. App'x 122
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wilkins, Luttig, Michael
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004073

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2432

JUDY BROWN, As mother and next friend of John
Travis Brown,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LYNN LADDER & SCAFFOLDING COMPANY,
INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
00-1099-S)

Submitted: March 27, 2001 Decided: April 20, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene A. Shapiro, P.A., SHAPIRO & DORMAN, P.A., Baltimore, Mary-
land, for Appellant. R. Wayne Pierce, Ann M. Grillo, NILES, BARTON
& WILMER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Judy Brown appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in Defendant’s favor in this products liability action.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v.

Lynn Ladder & Scaffolding Co., Inc., No. CA-00-1099-S (D. Md. Oct.

20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1004073. Public record. Not legal advice.