# Philips North America LLC v. KPI Healthcare, Inc.

> District Court, C.D. California · January 8, 2021

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10039894

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, C.D. California
- **Decided:** January 8, 2021
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10039894

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SOUTHERN DIVISION
11
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, a Case No.: 8:19-cv-01765-JVS-JDEx
12 Delaware Company, KONINKLIJKE
PHILIPS N.V., a Company of the [DISCOVERY MATTER]
13 Netherlands, and PHILIPS INDIA,
LTD., an Indian Company, Magistrate Judge John D. Early
14
Plaintiffs, AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
15 vs. REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
16 KPI HEALTHCARE INC., a California
Corporation; KPI HEALTHCARE First Amended Filed: December 3, 2019
17 ECOMMERCE, INC., a California Second Amended Answer and
Corporation; and DOES 1-10, Counterclaims Filed: May 15, 2020
18 inclusive,
Defendants.
19 KPI HEALTHCARE INC., a California
Corporation; KPI HEALTHCARE
20 ECOMMERCE, INC., a California
Corporation,
21 Counterclaimants,
vs.
22
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, a
23 Delaware Company, and
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., a
24 Company of the Netherlands, and
DOES 1-9, inclusive,
25 Counter-Defendants.
26
27
28
1 1. INTRODUCTION
2 1.1 PURPOSE AND LIMITS OF THIS ORDER
3 Discovery in this action is likely to involve confidential, proprietary, or private

4 information requiring special protection from public disclosure and from use for any

5 purpose other than this litigation. Thus, the Court enters this Amended Protective

6 Order. This Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses

7 to discovery, and the protection it gives from public disclosure and use extends only to

8 the specific material entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal

9 principles. This Order does not automatically authorize the filing under seal of

10 material designated under this Order. Instead, the parties must comply with L.R. 79-

11 5.1 if they seek to file anything under seal. This Order does not govern the use at trial

12 of material designated under this Order.

13 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT

14 The parties in this case are direct competitors in the ultrasound systems sales

15 business. The complaint alleges that the defendants are liable for trademark

16 infringement, trade secret misappropriation, and unfair competition, among other

17 things. This action will necessarily involve the exchange of confidential commercially
18 sensitive information. Accordingly, the special protection of this confidential
19 commercial and financial information from public disclosure and from use for any
20 purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
21 26(c)(1)(G) (“The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or
22 person…[,] requiring that a trade secret or other confidential research, development,
23 or commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in a specified way.”).
24 Such alleged confidential information includes, among other things, source code,
25 proprietary or confidential business or financial information, information regarding
26 confidential business practices, customer and potential customer lists, or other
27 confidential commercial and/or trade secret information otherwise generally
28 unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from
1 disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law
2 and disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk
3 of serious harm.

4 Additionally, there is a need for a three-tiered protective order that allows

5 designation of certain material as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’

6 EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE” as this action

7 involves allegations that Defendants misappropriated certain trade secrets and/or other

8 confidential or proprietary information and because discovery in this matter may seek

9 highly confidential trade secrets, including source code, of the Parties. See Elements

10 Spirits, Inc. v. Iconic Brands, Inc., Civ. No. CV 15-02692 DDP(AGRx), 2016 WL

11 2642206, at *1–*2, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61222, at *4 (C.D. Cal. May 9, 2016)

12 (holding that protective order with attorneys’ eyes only designation was warranted to

13 protect party’s confidential information) (citing Nutratech, Inc. v. Syntech Int’l, Inc.,

14 242 F.R.D. 552, 555 (C.D. Cal. 2008); Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960

15 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir. 1992)). The unauthorized or otherwise improper use of a

16 Party’s confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information gained through discovery

17 in this action is likely to cause grave and irreparable harm to the other Party. Thus, a
18 three-tiered designation system is warranted to protect the parties’ confidential,
19 proprietary, and trade secret information, including, without limitation, any
20 proprietary technology, from improper disclosure and the attendant risk of grave
21 competitive harm.
22 2. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
23 2.1 Over-Designation Prohibited. Any party or non-party who designates
24 information or items for protection under this Order as “CONFIDENTIAL,”
25 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY
26 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” (a “designator”) must only designate specific
27 material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. To the extent practicable, only
28 those parts of documents, items, or oral or written communications that require
1 protection shall be designated. Designations with a higher confidentiality level when a
2 lower level would suffice are prohibited. Mass, Indiscriminate, or routinized
3 designations are prohibited. Unjustified designations expose the designator to

4 sanctions, including the Court’s striking all confidentiality designations made by that

5 designator. Designation under this Order is allowed only if the designation is

6 necessary to protect material that, if disclosed to persons not authorized to view it,

7 would cause competitive or other recognized harm. Material may not be designated if

8 it has been made public, or if designation is otherwise unnecessary to protect a secrecy

9 interest. If a designator learns that information or items that it designated for

10 protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of

11 protection initially asserted, that designator must promptly notify all parties that it is

12 withdrawing the mistaken designation.

13 2.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Designation under this Order

14 requires the designator to affix the applicable legend (“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY

15 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

16 SOURCE CODE”) to each page that contains protected material. For testimony given

17 in deposition or other proceeding, the designator shall specify all protected testimony
18 and the level of protection being asserted. It may make that designation during the
19 deposition or proceeding, or may invoke, on the record or by written notice to all
20 parties on or before the next business day, a right to have up to 21 days from receipt of
21 the transcript of the deposition or proceeding to make its designation.
22 2.2.1 A party or non-party that makes original documents or materials
23 available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the
24 inspecting party has identified which material it would like copied and produced.
25 During the inspection and before the designation, all material shall be treated as
26 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY. After the inspecting party
27 has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the producing party must
28 designate the documents, or portions thereof, that qualify for protection under this
1 Order.
2 2.2.2 2.2.2 Parties shall give advance notice if they expect a deposition or
3 other proceeding to include designated material so that the other parties can ensure

4 that only authorized individuals are present at those proceedings when such material is

5 disclosed or used. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition shall not in any

6 way affect its designation. Any transcript that is prepared before the expiration of the

7 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been

8 designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY unless

9 otherwise agreed. After the expiration of the 21-day period, the transcript shall be

10 treated only as actually designated. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties should

11 strive to appropriately designate testimony during the deposition. If the Designating

12 Party determines that any portion of a transcript designated during the deposition as

13 CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY need

14 not be treated as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY

15 EYES ONLY, the Designating Party shall notify all other parties that the designation

16 is withdrawn, and specify the portions of the deposition transcript about which a

17 designation is being withdrawn.
18 If a Party challenges a designation in accordance with Section 3 of this Order,
19 all Parties agree to treat the deposition transcript and testimony as so designated until
20 an appropriate Court Order is entered or the Parties otherwise both agree to the
21 removal of a designation.
22 2.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. An inadvertent failure to designate
23 does not, standing alone, waive protection under this Order. Upon timely assertion or
24 correction of a designation, all recipients must make reasonable efforts to ensure that
25 the material is treated according to this Order.
26 3. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
27 All challenges to confidentiality designations shall proceed under L.R. 37-1
28 through L.R. 37-4.
1 4. ACCESS TO DESIGNATED MATERIAL
2 4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use designated material only for
3 this litigation. Designated material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons

4 and under the conditions described in this Order.

5 4.2 Disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL Material Without Further Approval.

6 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the designator,

7 a receiving party may disclose any material designated CONFIDENTIAL only to:

8 4.2.1 The receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this action and

9 employees of outside counsel of record to whom disclosure is reasonably

10 necessary;

11 4.2.2 The officers, directors, and employees of the receiving party to

12 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, and who have signed the Agreement

13 to Be Bound (Exhibit A);

14 4.2.3 Experts retained by the receiving party’s outside counsel of record

15 and their employees to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, and who have

16 signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A);

17 4.2.4 The Court and its personnel;
18 4.2.5 Outside court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial
19 consultants, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably
20 necessary, and
21 who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A);
22 4.2.6 During their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom
23 disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the Agreement to Be
24 Bound (Exhibit A);
25 4.2.7 The author or recipient of a document containing the material, or a
26 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
27 4.3 Disclosure of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES
28 ONLY and HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE Material Without
1 Further Approval.
2 Unless permitted in writing by the designator, a receiving party may disclose
3 material designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or

4 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE without further approval only to:

5 4.3.1 The receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this action and

6 employees of outside counsel of record to whom it is reasonably necessary to

7 disclose the information;

8 4.3.2 The Court and its personnel;

9 4.3.3 Outside court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial

10 consultants, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably

11 necessary, and who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A); and

12 4.3.4 The author or recipient of a document containing the material, or a

13 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

14 4.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of HIGHLY

15 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

16 –SOURCE CODE Material to In-House Counsel or Experts.

17 Unless agreed to in writing by the designator:
18 4.4.1 A party seeking to disclose to in-house counsel any material designated
19 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY must first make a written
20 request to the designator providing the full name of the in-house counsel, the city and
21 state of such counsel’s residence, and such counsel’s current and reasonably
22 foreseeable future primary job duties and responsibilities in sufficient detail to
23 determine present or potential involvement in any competitive decision-making. In-
24 house counsel are not authorized to receive material designated HIGHLY
25 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.
26 4.4.2 A party seeking to disclose to an expert retained by outside counsel of
27 record any information or item that has been designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
28 – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
1 must first make a written request to the designator that (1) identifies the general
2 categories of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY
3 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE information that the receiving party seeks

4 permission to disclose to the expert, (2) sets forth the full name of the expert and the

5 city and state of his or her primary residence, (3) attaches a copy of the expert’s

6 current resume, (4) identifies the expert’s current employer(s), (5) identifies each

7 person or entity from whom the expert has received compensation or funding for work

8 in his or her areas of expertise (including in connection with litigation) in the past five

9 years, and (6) identifies (by name and number of the case, filing date, and location of

10 court) any litigation where the expert has offered expert testimony, including by

11 declaration, report, or testimony at deposition or trial, in the past five years. If the

12 expert believes any of this information at (4) - (6) is subject to a confidentiality

13 obligation to a third party, then the expert should provide whatever information the

14 expert believes can be disclosed without violating any confidentiality agreements, and

15 the party seeking to disclose the information to the expert shall be available to meet

16 and confer with the designator regarding any such confidentiality obligations.

17 4.4.3 A party that makes a request and provides the information specified in
18 paragraph 4.4.1 or 4.4.2 may disclose the designated material to the identified in-
19 house counsel or expert unless, within seven days of delivering the request, the party
20 receives a written objection from the designator providing detailed grounds for the
21 objection.
22 4.4.4 All challenges to objections from the designator shall proceed under L.R.
23 37-1 through L.R. 37-4.
24 5. SOURCE CODE
25 5.1 Designation of Source Code. If production of source code is necessary,
26 a party may designate it as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE if it is, or
27 includes, confidential, proprietary, or trade secret source code.
28 5.2 Location and Supervision of Inspection. Any HIGHLY
1 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE produced in discovery shall be made available
2 for inspection, in a format allowing it to be reasonably reviewed and searched, during
3 normal business hours or at other mutually agreeable times, at an office of the

4 designating party’s counsel or another mutually agreeable location. The source code

5 shall be made available for inspection on a secured computer in a secured room, and

6 the inspecting party shall not copy, remove, or otherwise transfer any portion of the

7 source code onto any recordable media or recordable device. The designator may

8 visually monitor the activities of the inspecting party’s representatives during any

9 source code review, but only to ensure that there is no unauthorized recording,

10 copying, or transmission of the source code.

11 5.3 Paper Copies of Source Code Excerpts. The inspecting party may

12 request paper copies of limited portions of source code that are reasonably necessary

13 for the preparation of court filings, pleadings, expert reports, other papers, or for

14 deposition or trial. The designator shall provide all such source code in paper form,

15 including Bates numbers and the label “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE

16 CODE.” Within five business days of receiving a request for paper copies, the

17 designator may challenge the amount of source code requested in hard copy form
18 under L.R. 37-1 through L.R. 37-4. Requests for continuous blocks of source code
19 totaling up to 50 pages and requests totaling up to 500 pages of source code are
20 presumed reasonable. Requests for continuous blocks of source code exceeding 50
21 pages and requests exceeding 500 total pages of source code are presumed
22 unreasonable, but the requesting party may overcome the presumption by presenting
23 good cause. It is the requesting party’s burden to obtain such relief. These
24 restrictions and presumptions shall not apply to the limited portions of redacted source
25 code provided to the Copyright Office pursuant to its deposit requirements for
26 copyrights at issue in this action.
27 5.4 Access Record. The inspecting party shall maintain a record of any
28 individual who has inspected any portion of the source code in electronic or paper
1 form, and shall maintain all paper copies of any printed portions of the source code in
2 a secured, locked area.
3 The inspecting party shall not convert any of the information contained in the

4 paper copies into any electronic format other than for the preparation of a pleading,

5 exhibit, expert report, discovery document, deposition transcript, or other Court

6 document. Any paper copies used during a deposition shall be retrieved at the end of

7 each day and must not be left with a court reporter or any other unauthorized

8 individual.

9 7. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED

10 IN OTHER LITIGATION

11 7.1 Subpoenas and Court Orders. This Order in no way excuses non-

12 compliance with a lawful subpoena or court order. The purpose of the duties described

13 in this section is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this Order and to give

14 the designator an opportunity to protect its confidentiality interests in the court where

15 the subpoena or order issued.

16 7.2 Notification Requirement. If a party is served with a subpoena or a

17 court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or
18 items designated in this action as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
19 ATTORNEY EYES ONLY, or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE, that
20 party must:
21 7.2.1 Promptly notify the designator in writing. Such notification shall
22 include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
23 7.2.2 Promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or
24 order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by
25 the subpoena or order is subject to this Order. Such notification shall include a
26 copy of this Order; and
27 7.2.3 Cooperate with all reasonable procedures sought by the designator
28 whose material may be affected.
1 7.3 Wait For Resolution of Protective Order. If the designator timely
2 seeks a protective order, the party served with the subpoena or court order shall not
3 produce any information designated in this action as CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY

4 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

5 SOURCE CODE before a determination by the court where the subpoena or order

6 issued, unless the party has obtained the designator’s permission. The designator shall

7 bear the burden and expense of seeking protection of its confidential material in that

8 court.

9 8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF DESIGNATED MATERIAL

10 If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed

11 designated material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this

12 Order, it must immediately (1) notify in writing the designator of the unauthorized

13 disclosures, (2) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the designated

14 material, (3) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were

15 made of all the terms of this Order, and (4) use reasonable efforts to have such person

16 or persons execute the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A).

17 9. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
18 PROTECTED MATERIAL
19 When a producing party gives notice that certain inadvertently produced
20 material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the
21 receiving parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B).
22 This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an
23 e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review pursuant
24 to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e).
25 10. FILING UNDER SEAL
26 Without written permission from the designator or a Court order, a party may
27 not file in the public record in this action any designated material. A party seeking to
28 file under seal any designated material must comply with L.R. 79-5.1. Filings may be
1 made under seal only pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific
2 material at issue. The fact that a document has been designated under this Order is
3 insufficient to justify filing under seal. Instead, parties must explain the basis for

4 confidentiality of each document sought to be filed under seal. Because a party other

5 than the designator will often be seeking to file designated material, cooperation

6 between the parties in preparing, and in reducing the number and extent of, requests

7 for under seal filing is essential. If a receiving party’s request to file designated

8 material under seal pursuant to L.R. 79-5.1 is denied by the Court, then the receiving

9 party may file the material in the public record unless (1) the designator seeks

10 reconsideration within four business days of the denial, or (2) as otherwise instructed

11 by the Court.

12 11. MISCELLANEOUS

13 11.1 Right to Further Relief

14 11.1.1. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its

15 modification by the Court in the future.

16 11.1.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By entry of this Protective Order, no

17 Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing
18 any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Amended Protective
19 Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in
20 evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.
21 12. FINAL DISPOSITION
22 Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, each party shall return
23 all designated material to the designator or destroy such material, including all copies,
24 abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing
25 any designated material. The receiving party must submit a written certification to the
26 designator by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate)
27 all the designated material that was returned or destroyed, and (2) affirms that the
28 receiving party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, or any
1 || other format reproducing or capturing any of the designated material. This provision
2 || shall not prevent counsel from retaining an archival copy of all pleadings, motion
3 || papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence,
A || deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and
5 || expert work product, even if such materials contain designated material. Any such
6 || archival copies remain subject to this Order.
7 || 13. NON-PARTY DESIGNATIONS
8 Any Information that may be produced by a non-Party or non-Party witness in
9 || discovery in the Proceeding pursuant to subpoena or otherwise may _ be
10 || designated by such non-Party or non-Party witness as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
11 | “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY EYES ONLY” under the terms of this
12 || Amended Protective Order, and any such designation by a non-Party or non-Party
13 || witness shall have the same force and effect, and create the same duties and
14 || obligations on the Parties, as if made by one of the undersigned Parties hereto.
15
16
7 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN (see Dkt. 46-1 to 46-7, 49, 50, 132-1 to 132-6),
ig || IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20 || Dated: January 08, 2021 EL.
1G D. EARLY :
nited States Magistrate Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1 EXHIBIT A
2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3

4 I, [print or type full name], of

5 [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have

6 read in its entirety and understand the Amended Protective Order that was issue by the

7 United States District Court for the Central District of California on January 8, 2021

8 in the case of Philips North America, LLC, et al. v. KPI Healthcare Inc., et. al., 8:19-

9 cv-01765-JVS-JDE. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this

10 Amended Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so

11 comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I

12 solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is

13 subject to this Amended Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict

14 compliance with the provisions of this Order.

15 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court

16 for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this

17 Amended Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after
18 termination of this action. I hereby appoint [print or type
19 full name] of [print or type full address and telephone
20 number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or
21 any proceedings related to enforcement of this Amended Protective Order.
22 Date:
23 City and State where sworn and signed:
24 Printed Name:
25 Signature:
26
27
28

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10039894. Public record. Not legal advice.
