# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 16, 2001 · 5 F. App'x 316

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1003810

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John E. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 16, 2001
- **Citations:** 5 F. App'x 316
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Motz, Traxler, King
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1003810

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN E. BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CR-97-687, CA-00-2758-3-19)

Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Claude Jendron, Jr., As-
sistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

John E. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-97-687; CA-00-2758-3-

19 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1003810. Public record. Not legal advice.