# (PC) Brown v. Chothia

> District Court, E.D. California · February 11, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10033454

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** February 11, 2022
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10033454

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 | EUGENE C. BROWN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00352-DAD-EPG (PC)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR
13 v. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
14 | C. CHOTHIA, et al.,
(ECF No. 97)
15 Defendants.
16
7 On February 9, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with

8 rejudice. (ECF No. 97.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with
rejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th
19
ir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
20
However, the Court retains jurisdiction over the litigation to enforce the terms of the
21
parties’ settlement agreement.
22
23
94 [T IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _February 11, 2022 [Je hey
26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28

1
2

3

4

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10033454. Public record. Not legal advice.