# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 15, 2000

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1002971

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 15, 2000
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1002971

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DOVON BROWN, a/k/a Capone,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CR-95-144-H, CA-99-672-H)

Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dovon Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Dovon Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability, deny Brown’s motion for judicial notice, and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Brown, Nos. CR-95-144-H; CA-99-672-H (E.D.N.C. filed July 10;

entered July 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1002971. Public record. Not legal advice.