# (PC) Chubbuck v. Brown

> District Court, E.D. California · March 25, 2021

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10026222

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** March 25, 2021
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10026222

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DAVID T. CHUBBUCK, No. 2:19-cv-2608 KJM CKD P
12 Plaintiff,
13 v. ORDER
14 JERRY BROWN, et al.,
15 Defendants.
16
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20 On January 4, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21 which were served upon plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings
22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to
23 the findings and recommendations.
24 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and
25 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to
26 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times as required by Local Rule 182(f) (absent
27 such notice service of documents at record address of party is fully effective).
28 /////
1 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
2 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
3 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed
4 the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
5 the magistrate judge’s analysis.
6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
7 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 4, 2021, are adopted in full;
8 2. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; and
9 3. This case is closed.
10 DATED: March 24, 2021.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10026222. Public record. Not legal advice.