# Brown v. Trent

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 30, 2000

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1002334

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 30, 2000
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1002334

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6486

PAUL DION BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE TRENT; DAVID DEAN; MICHAEL COLEMAN,
A.W.O., Official and Individual Capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge.
(CA-98-350-5)

Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 30, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Dion Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Jeanette Bray, George John
Joseph, BAILEY & WYANT, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia; Leslie
K. Kiser, Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DEPART-
MENT OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Paul Dion Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation and sustaining the

defendant’s objections and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v.

Trent, No. CA-98-350-5 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1002334. Public record. Not legal advice.