# (HC) Brown v. Warden of U.S.P. Atwater

> District Court, E.D. California · October 23, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10022961

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** October 23, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10022961

## Opinion text

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10

11 JABORIE BROWN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00233-SAB-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S
MOTION TO STAY
13 v.
(ECF No. 12)
14 WARDEN OF U.S.P. ATWATER,
15 Respondent.

16
17 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
19 On September 10, 2020, Respondent moved to stay the instant proceeding pending
20 adjudication of Petitioner’s § 2255 motion, which is currently pending in the United States
21 District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (ECF No. 12). To date, Petitioner has not filed
22 any opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to stay, and the time for doing so
23 has passed.
24 Both the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition before this Court and the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion
25 before the sentencing court filed by Petitioner raise similar claims based upon United States v.
26 Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). (ECF No. 1; Ex. 2, ECF No. 13). Moreover, the § 2255 motion
27 filed in the sentencing court predates the § 2241 petition before this Court. Given that the
Southern District of Florida’s resolution of the § 2255 motion may provide clarity to the
1 | jurisdictional issue presented in this case and may even be fully determinative of the outcome,
2 | the Court finds that the objective of judicial efficiency is served by staying the instant proceeding
3 | pending resolution of Petitioner’s § 2255 motion in the Southern District of Florida.!
4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5 1. Respondent’s motion to stay (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED; and
6 2. Respondent shall file a status report regarding the § 2255 matter and any appeal on or
7 before December 22, 2020.
8
9 IT IS SO ORDERED. OF a Se
10 | Dated: _October 22, 2020 _ ef
4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 |
' The Court notes, however, that such a stay should not be indefinite, and the Court may revisit the stay in the event
28 | that resolution of the § 2255 motion is unduly prolonged.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10022961. Public record. Not legal advice.